The SeNB acquiring CSG identity state information of the UE (501) and "A method for controlling access of a Closed Subscriber Group, CSG, in a dual-connection architecture, the dual-connection architecture referring to a User Equipment, UE, simultaneously maintaining connections with two different eNBs, wherein the UE is connected to a master eNB, MeNB, which is adapted to determine a CSG status of the UE, and based on the determination, a secondary eNB, SeNB, is added for simultaneous connection between the MeNB, the SeNB and the UE, Claim 1 of the sole request reads as follows: In response to the board's communication, the appellant indicated that it would not be attending the scheduled oral proceedings and requested partial reimbursement of the appeal fee. In a communication pursuant to Article 15(1) RPBA 2020, the board stated its intention to remit the case to the examining division, the only remaining issue for discussion during oral proceedings being the appellant's request for reimbursement of the appeal fee under Rule 103(1)(a) EPC. The appeal further requested rectification of the impugned decision under Article 109(1) EPC and the reimbursement of the appeal fee under Rule 103(1)(a) EPC.
![microsoft toolkit 2.4.5 download microsoft toolkit 2.4.5 download](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-b4ihYbdv6eg/UPLHu_1TiBI/AAAAAAAABsU/QHx1Z06SBM8/s1600/Microsoft+Office+toolkit+v2.4+beta+5.png)
The appellant requested that the appealed decision be set aside and that a patent be granted on the basis of the claims of a sole request filed with the statement of grounds of appeal. During the examination proceedings, the examining division referred inter alia to the following prior-art document: The appeal was lodged against the decision of the examining division to refuse the present European patent application for lack of novelty (Article 54(3) EPC) with respect to the independent claims of a sole set of claims (sole request). Inconsistency between Guidelines and Case Lawĭifferent interpretation of Article 109(1) EPC from that provided for in the Guidelines for Examination in the EPO - application of ArticleĢ0(2) RPBA 2020 (see point 2.4.3 of the Reasons). Partial reimbursement of appeal fee at 25% - (yes): timely withdrawal of request for oral proceedings Remittal - (yes): special reasons for remittal Interlocutory revision - examining division should have rectified decision (yes) Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 020(2)ĭecision in written proceedings: cancellation of hearing following appellant's announcement of non-attendance Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(8)
![microsoft toolkit 2.4.5 download microsoft toolkit 2.4.5 download](https://passasr.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/3/7/133708457/105653386_orig.jpg)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 011 Method and system for controlling access of CSG in dual-connection architecture Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Registerīibliographic information is available in: